SIDEBAR
»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
Using Polls As A Tool Of Totalitarianism
Apr 26th, 2010 by Tunya Audain

 

Polls Can Easily Become A Tool Of Totalitarianism

BC is experiencing a deluge of organized attacks and destabilization maneuvers to force more funding for government schools. 

Even though throughout the rest of the world the same constraints on public spending are being felt, and school spending is seriously being cut back, BC seems to be experiencing more than its share of grief from the lobbies which benefit from the education tax dollar. 

Thus, we see the call for more funding for public service workers – teachers — in our schools, rather than more efficient spending of money.  That independent schools do “more with less” is a thorn in the side of the public government schools.

On another blog, one in Ontario (School for Thought), we were discussing tools of totalitarianism and how the media was used to ensnare citizens to totalitarian thinking.  The article started out with Hitler having said  “Your child belongs to us already”’ and then we discussed how a totalitarian state used propaganda techniques to brainwash.

I contributed a classic case of how polls can be used to contribute to totalitarianism and I provided the link to the Vancouver Sun story about the Angus Reid poll:  “Most British Columbians want more public-school funding: poll”.

This poll was commissioned by a group whose aim is in the name:  BC Society for Public Education.  Therefore, you know that  they lobby for more public education and, of course, for less competition from independent schools.  And that is what the poll delivered. 

Briefly, there were three questions: 1) Should the government do more to support public education; 2) to increase funding for public education, and 3) to continue funding private schools?  The scores were 81% YES 79% YES and 64% NO.  What an outstanding result!   It garnered considerable mileage in the press and meetings. The poll achieved what the client wanted.

The newspaper, however, through its blogging ability, received over 100 comments and, unfortunately (for the lobby), some serious questions were raised:

1.  Were the questions loaded? Or leading?
2.  Isn’t Angus Reid polling rather questionable considering they are left-wing and support massive social spending?  Don’t they use questionable polling techniques, that is, online polling?
3.  Who is behind this poll and who pays?

The answers:

1.  See the pdf for the questions  http://www.scribd.com/full/30311572?access_key=key-u1vfkvolw0eiygqp0qj
Note how the preamble leads to a “correct” answer.  How it “primes the pump”, so to speak, for the waterworks to follow.  The questions were well “crafted”, manufactured.

2.  The online polling is questionable. The “random selection” was done from the Angus Reid Forum, a self-volunteered array of citizens who get points for surveys taken, and qualify for monthly awards of $1000, $100, or other perks.  The left-wing swing of the principal of the company is well noted in his writings.

3.  The group commissioning the poll has been in place since 2005 and with Board members long associated with “progressive” activism, including Patti Bacchus, current chair of the VSB.  (Wouldn’t they  just love to deflect an accounting probe away from the VSB?)  Two current BCSPE Board members, Helesia Luke and Catherine Evans, run a communications, public relations, guerilla marketing company.  Their literature includes these statements: “How you ask questions is important – language matters”, and “Asking questions influences groups in some way.” Funding for BCSPE and expensive polls  – who know?

What if, what if the poll did have more credibility.  That is, what if a disinterested group (one without an agenda or self-interest) commissioned a poll on these issues?  Suppose someone, just for an academic exercise, repeated such a survey, but with a different slant to the questions and preamble, could they have achieved a result of 81% NO, 79 % NO to more support or funding for public education, and 64% YES for continued funding for private schools?

The headlines would scream:  “8 out of 10 British Columbians want government to stop supporting and funding public education: poll”.  “2 out of 3 want more funding for private schools: poll”.

Wishful thinking?  SURPRISE.  The Angus Reid Chief Research Officer, Andrew Grenville, coincidentally on the same day as the BCSPE newsrelease came out (Apr 21, 2010), illustrates my point –  that with the right questions you can get exactly 180 degree different answers, 100% opposites!  Please see this article:  Why The Way You Ask a Question Can Determine The Answer.  http://www.visioncritical.com/2010/04/why-the-way-you-ask-a-question-can-determine-the-answer/

So, is this education underfunding crisis in BC a magnificent example of engineering disinformation and propaganda by ideological stakeholders? Isn’t that how agent provocateurs work?

 

Parent Rights and Their Children’s Education
Apr 6th, 2010 by Tunya Audain

PARENT RIGHTS AND THEIR CHILDREN’S EDUCATION
 
The Right to

1. Choice

2. Information

3. Be Heard & Consulted

4. Special Assistance

5. Involvement

6. Safeguards

7. Appeal


 
The rights compiled here are those that generally apply in most democratic countries. They have been gathered from sources in Canada, United States, England, and Australia. Some of these rights are self-evident, some are inscribed in law. Others are simply standards which parents have grown to expect when good educational practice is followed.
 
1. THE RIGHT TO CHOICE
 
“Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.” (Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948)
 
This means, that while parents have a duty to see that their children are educated to a reasonable level of self-sufficiency and citizenship, they can choose how this is to be accomplished: public, private or church schools, tutoring, correspondence courses, home study, or other styles. If a style other than a public school is chosen and the parents are challenged, the onus is generally on the state to demonstrate that the child is not being educated at a level equal to his peers in a public school. The mandate of the public schools is to make available to all children in the community an education which is free, appropriate and equal. Parents have a right to choose and expect at least that minimum for their child.
 
2. THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION
 
In order for parents to make a proper choice, they need adequate information. They need to know enough details about schools so that when they do register their child into a particular school, they are in effect, giving “informed consent” for the child to be there. Equally important, they need ongoing information as the child progresses through the school programs so that they can maintain confidence and support for the school, or withdraw the child if things prove unsatisfactory. If theirs is a public school, parents need information for one other reason — to help them provide informed opinions to the school and to participate in school decision-making. Specifically, parents have the right:
 
  1. to obtain sufficient details about schools to enable them to make informed choices about schools
  2. to receive specific, understandable information about their child’s progress; strengths and weaknesses
  3. to see all student records and files on their child, to expect that the information therein is confidential and respects the privacy of parents and student, and to request that inaccuracies and damaging information be removed
  4. to obtain information about any program in which their child is engaged, the rationale for the program, the evaluation methods used, and the credentials and job description of those implementing the program
  5. to visit and observe any programs involving their child
  6. to easy access to those working with their child (teachers, principal, specialists)
  7. to receive information about school services — including alternatives in the system, procedures, rules, and to be informed about changes
  8. to see that the public school board is operated as an open public business, that is, that the public has a right to see all policies, budgets, minutes, and official reports, and to see that decisions are made at public meetings.
 
3. THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD & CONSULTED
 
As advocates for their children, parents have a responsibility to inform public schools about their expectations concerning their children’s education. And this means that if the public system is to be responsive, parents must be accorded the right and the opportunity to be heard. They have a right to be heard by the teacher, by the total school staff (for example, on such items as philosophy, goals and programs), by the local school board and the higher educational authorities. Parents, as individuals and in parent groups, have a right to be heard when policies are being formulated, when planning is undertaken, when budgets are being prepared, and when evaluation is being conducted. They have a right to present briefs, make statements, and try to influence decision-making about schools their children attend.
 
4. THE RIGHT TO SPECIAL ASSISTANCE
 
Parents have the right to expect special services for children with handicaps, limitations, disabilities or exceptional talents. Parents also have the right in these instances to expect special assistance for themselves so that they can understand the situation and be enabled to continue helping their child. Parents whose children have been taken into care by the state (e.g., foster care, correctional institution) also have a right to expect special services to help their children continue their education, and for themselves so that they can maintain a helping contact as much as possible or desirable.
 
5. THE RIGHT TO INVOLVEMENT
 
Parents, as co-educators and guides of their child’s total education, have a right to be involved in that part of the child’s day spent in school. Particularly, it is important to know that parents have the right:
 
  1. to understand the principles, aims and programs of formal education so that they can support, enrich and provide home follow-through to school programs. At times, parents have also found it necessary to have this basic understanding in order to provide external remediation or tutoring.
  2. to have their child excused from programs or prescribed reading which offends the values of the home, when specifically requested
  3. to consultation before fundamental changes are made which affect the parents, the child, or the total school climate
  4. to participate in evaluation procedures affecting their child’s programs, and in formulation of policy, goals and shape of education
  5. to be involved in the event their child is to be suspended from school. The student has the right to “due process” and parents and student are part of the affected parties to be heard before judgment or action is taken and before the student is suspended for just cause.
 
6. THE RIGHT TO SAFEGUARDS
 
Parents have the right to expect that a school system has certain standards that govern good practice. Specifically, parents have the right:
 
  1. to expect safeguards which protect their children from physical, intellectual and emotional negligence or abuse;
  2. to receive assurance that their school does not allow unauthorized invasions of their child’s privacy or property (e.g., questionnaires which pry into family life, searches of lockers)
  3. to expect that parental permission is required before psychological, psychiatric, or medical assessment and/or treatment of the child are undertaken;
  4. to expect strict supervision over new programs, innovations and experiments, and that parents have special rights in these instances:
    • to receive a written description of the program, rationale, goals and supporting references;
    • to grant or refuse permission for their child’s attendance
    • to receive satisfaction that the program is run by qualified, well-prepared personnel
    • to be involved in the ongoing evaluation.
 
7. THE RIGHT TO APPEAL
 
Parents have the right to appeal decisions which they consider unsatisfactory and to report behavior which they consider might be incompatible with good educational practice. Parents should be informed of their lines of appeal, which generally start with the teacher, then proceed up through to the principal, the school board, to the government ministry in charge. Parents have a right to receive, on request, a written explanation which responds to their appeal, and which they might require in pursuing their grievance further up the ladder. Matters of law can be referred to a court for judgment, and the normal civil remedies exist when it is considered damages should be claimed.
 
Parent Role, Rights and Responsibilities in the Education of Their Children
 
With respect to educational rights, parents have a two-fold duty: to know and exercise their own rights, and to know and enforce their children’s rights. As users of the educational system, and as advocates for their children, parents are duty-bound to act well and wisely to see that the system works to the advantage of their children and the community’s children. If the rights here described are challenged by school officials, they have a right to ask why rights parents enjoy in other jurisdictions are denied them. And they have a right to receive an explanation.
 
Interwoven with rights are responsibilities and some of these have been mentioned earlier. Besides all that parents have to do to provide the kind of home life and support for good education to happen, they also have to do their part in building a co-operative relationship with educational authorities. Parents need that relationship to ensure that policies and programs are developed as close “to home” as possible  —  close to the important parent-child-teacher relationship. The rights enumerated here should provide the confidence and background to help build that co-operative framework.
 
REMEMBER: It has always been, except in totalitarian states, the duty of parents to educate their children.
  • England: It shall be the duty of the parent of every child of compulsory school age to cause him to receive efficient full-time education suitable to his age, ability, and aptitude, either by regular attendance at school or otherwise. (Education Act, 1944)
  • United States: The first School Laws in America (1642) underlie the system to this day: “Universal education of youth is essential to the well-being of the State. The obligation to furnish this education rests primarily upon the parents.”
  • Canada: “The responsibility is placed by law upon the parents or guardian to educate their children.” (You and the Law, 1973)
  • The UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) supports this parental duty.
The public schools do have a statutory duty to provide a free education to all students whose parents choose to register them. However, it is made clear in all school law that parents are to be kept informed of the progress of the child. This information must be accurate and understandable to the parents so that they in turn can exercise their duty by supporting, augmenting, intervening or withdrawing from that school. 
 
Public schools serve a two-fold purpose: to assist parents in meeting their parental obligation in the education of their children and to serve the broader public interest in seeing that citizens are educated to a certain standard.
 
- Compiled in 1977 by Education Advisory, an independent research and advisory service about effective parent participation in education.
»  Substance:WordPress   »  Style:Ahren Ahimsa